Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Wikipedia:RfPP)
    Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.

    Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection)

    After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:ProtectedPages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here



    Current requests for increase in protection level

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

    Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or, failing that, the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


    Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – ARBPIA. PlotinusEnjoyer (talk) 22:59, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Many recent edits by non-ec users to content related to IP conflict area. DMH223344 (talk) 23:25, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – ARBPIA. PlotinusEnjoyer (talk) 23:51, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: High level of IP vandalism. 120.22.58.136 (talk) 00:08, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Lots of unexplained and disputed changes to the film's listed genres mainly by IP editors in the past several days. –WPA (talk) 00:20, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – ARBPIA. PlotinusEnjoyer (talk) 00:36, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite semi-protection: Requesting semi move and edit protection as I've seen multiple cases where new users will edit this page to create their article. One case even required an admin to do a histmerge (hence the request for move protection as well). ~ Rusty meow ~ 01:21, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary pending changes protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. — Richwales (no relation to Jimbo) 02:26, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Persistent disruptive editing by new users. Johnj1995 (talk) 02:58, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous unsourced and non-NPOV additions from multiple IPs and accounts over the last few days. Iiii I I I (talk) 05:06, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Move prot (highly visible). 2603:8080:600:AADE:C14D:1F87:CC42:9CD9 (talk) 05:11, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: High level of vandalism, not only with IPs but also with users with accounts. Allyriana000 (talk) 06:07, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Vandalism 190.32.172.134 (talk) 06:32, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    +1 Reason: Vandalism 185.74.53.18 (talk) 06:38, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    I have to oppose this completely. These IPs are retaliating in response to reverts of their vandalism. Note as well the first IP is globally blocked via Meta. Jalen Barks (Woof) 02:28, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Persistent violation of WP:ARBECR. Skitash (talk) 08:18, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent sock puppetry by a single user trying to self-promote. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 11:56, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism, including insertion of POV commentary. ZimZalaBim talk 12:31, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – edit-warring IP, adding unsourced text in part claiming to be in reffed source (which its not). IP does not stop despite my complaints. Denniss (talk) 12:47, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by longtime sockpuppet vandal. Bgsu98 (Talk) 13:18, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Months of LTA block evasion via dynamic IPs. — MarkH21talk 13:27, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Vandalism due to ongoing scandal RowanJ LP (talk) 13:33, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Mike Allen 14:25, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Vandalism. TylerBurden (talk) 15:56, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP hopper blanking page. Jalen Barks (Woof) 16:07, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Constant disruptive IP edits adding unsourced original research. SleepyRedHair (talk) 16:33, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Persistent disruptive editing in the last days. Xexerss (talk) 16:50, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Newly released Indian film, over 150 edits since 02:51 this morning - mostly IPs edit-warring over reception and financial figures, without any sources. - Arjayay (talk) 17:34, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated unconstructive changes by an IP. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 18:48, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. @Curb Safe Charmer: Please try communicating with the editor (on their talk page is probably best). The article is not at the point where protection is warranted. Also, if there was sufficient disruption, then semi-protection would be sufficient since it's an IP address editor. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:09, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Gagarin-related IP proxies. (CC) Tbhotch 21:36, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Already protected by administrator zzuuzz. Favonian (talk) 08:37, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. FMSky (talk) 22:03, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary pending changes: Persistent disruptive editing – Not sure what to do here. Moxy🍁 22:24, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    (Non-administrator comment) Edit war, I recommend;
    Temporary semi-protection: Valorrr (lets chat) 22:27, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism, almost non-stop vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 01:21, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Jalen Barks (Woof) 02:14, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: High level of IP vandalism. RCSCott91 (talk) 02:50, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – ARBPIA. PlotinusEnjoyer (talk) 02:53, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent addition of unsourced material from even autoconfirmed accounts. ECP seems necessary at this point. Trailblazer101 (talk) 03:15, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Temporary extended confirmed protection Article was protected for four days by Chetsford due to genre warring, edit warring, and general disruptive editing by IP editors, newly registered editors, and existing accounts that are rarely used. During that time, Chetsford acknowledged that another protection block would probably be needed after the four days and it absoulutely does as all of the previous behavior continues. NJZombie (talk) 04:14, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: The group appear to have changed name and a move discussion is in place regarding logistics and confirmation. In the meantime there are IPs changing things in the page despite hidden notes advising not to. Requesting one week protection while the move discussion is happening. orangesclub 🍊 04:20, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: random IP vandalism on a contemporary figure. IDK why a bit of a hot topic again, but maybe semi-protection for a week or two Bluethricecreamman (talk) 04:39, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: random ip and new user vandalism recently, idk why. maybe semi for a few weeks. Bluethricecreamman (talk) 04:42, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – vandalism from multiple ips. Cowboygilbert - (talk) ♥ 05:12, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    +1 Reason: High Level of Vandalism due to recent elimination from Playoffs by the Edmonton Oilers. Leading to "owner" being changed to "Edmonton Oilers" Pelon1071 (talk) 06:14, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    +2 Temporary extended-confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism. Wikan Boy 123 (talk) 06:27, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Agreed, it needs this exact protection for three days. Fyunck(click) (talk) 07:07, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Already protected by administrator Lofty abyss. Favonian (talk) 08:40, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: IP vandalism. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 05:28, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Withdrawing, seems like someone else already dealt with the IP account Jeffrey34555 (talk) 05:30, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Withdrawn by requestor – Favonian (talk) 08:43, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Persistent vandalism. Also please add cascading protection Wikan Boy 123 (talk) 06:26, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Blocked IP keeps jumping to other IPs to keep adding his 'expert opinion'. Nswix (talk) 06:28, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Blocked IP keeps jumping to other IPs to keep adding his 'expert opinion'. Nswix (talk) 06:28, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: High level of IP vandalism Tonyy Starkk (talk) 06:34, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Reason: Arbitration enforcement, American Politics 76.68.113.121 (talk) 07:01, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for reduction in protection level

    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

    Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

    • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
    • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
    • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
    • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.

    Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Unprotection: Only Removal of Pending Changes. Because the page is Semi Protected indefinitely, so it is redundant. 204.107.19.33 (talk) 03:50, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

     DoneFavonian (talk) 08:36, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for edits to a protected page

    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here

    Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

    • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
    • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
    • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
    • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
    • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.


    new tab 175.100.11.142 (talk) 19:49, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined - Gonna need to be more specific. We can't act on vague, contextless requests. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 05:59, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    Handled requests

    A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.